USPTO serial 76697277
WASTE ONE 1 L.S L.S L.S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WASTE ONE 1 L.S L.S L.S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A Rolston
GORGE A ROLSTON45 SHEPPARD AVE EASTSTE 900TORONTO ONTARIO, M2N 5W9Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | COLLECTION OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL GARBAGE, RENTAL OF REFUSE CONTAINERS, AND DELIVERY AND TRANSPORTATION OF REFUSE CONTAINERS, DELIVERY OF AGGREGATES, STONE CHIPS, GRAVEL, SOIL AND MULCH, DELIVERY AND TRANSPORTATION OF REFUSE SACKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Waste One Disposal Services Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Waste One Disposal Services Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named WASTE ONE 1 L.S L.S L.S
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 11, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |