Drawing for PSYCHOLOGY MEETS TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76697544

PSYCHOLOGY MEETS TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PSYCHOLOGY MEETS TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen D. Geimer

STEPHEN D. GEIMER WOOD, PHILLIPS, KATZ, CLARK & MORTIMER500 W MADISON ST STE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60661-2562UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an internet website for business time management, billing and providing advertising services for professionalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance