USPTO serial 76697835
FONT L C
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4035178Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2011
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FONT L C?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Osaka, 590-8522, JP
Osaka 545-8522, JP
Osaka 545-8522, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
Donna J. Bunton NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 NORTH GLEBE ROAD11th FloorARLINGTON, VA 22203-1808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for clearly displaying easy-to-read characters on LCD screens, sold as an integral component of LCD television receivers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2008 |
| 028 | Computer software for clearly displaying easy-to-read characters on LCD screens, sold as an integral component of hand-held games with liquid crystal displays and hand-held units for playing electronic video games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named FONT L C
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 4, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |