USPTO serial 76697839
Q-D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Q-D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray
PETER D. MURRAY COOPER & DUNHAM LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | FILLED INK CARTRIDGES, FILLED TONER CARTRIDGES FOR USE IN COPYING MACHINES, FACSIMILE MACHINES, PRINTING MACHINES AND PRINTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ELECTROSTATIC, ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC, THERMAL AND PHOTOGRAPHIC COPYING MACHINES; COLOR COPYING MACHINES; DOCUMENT SORTERS, DOCUMENT COLLATORS, AUTOMATIC DOCUMENT FEEDERS AND STAPLE UNITS; FACSIMILE APPARATUS; PRINTERS, NAMELY, COMPUTER, LASER, LASER COLOR, INK-JET, IMPACT, DOT MATRIX AND BUBBLE-JET PRINTERS, PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFOR AND ACCESSORIES AND PERIPHERALS FOR USE THEREWITH, NAMELY, PRINTER CONTROLLERS, WIRELESS LAN BOARDS FOR PRINTER CONTROLLERS, PRINTER DRIVERS, FONTS FOR COMPUTER PRINTERS, INTERFACE CABLES, NETWORK INTERFACE BOARD, SOFTWARE FOR USE IN OPERATING PRINTERS, MULTI FUNCTIONAL DEVICES WHICH INCORPORATE COPIER, FACSIMILE, SCANNER AND/OR PRINTER FUNCTIONS; PARTS, FITTINGS AND ACCESSORIES OR OPTIONAL DEVICES FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS NAMELY, OPTIONAL MEMORY BOARD, HARD DISC DRIVE, COPY AND PRINTED PAPER TRAY, PAPER FEEDER AND DUPLEX PRINTING UNIT; SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS, ALL FOR MANAGING DOCUMENTS, NAMELY, THE TRANSFERRING, STORING, FILING, CATEGORIZING AND PRINTING OF DOCUMENTS THROUGH DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, DATA PROCESSORS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERAL APPARATUS FOR DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, MONITORS, KEYBOARDS, MODEMS AND SERVERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; OPERATING SOFTWARE FOR TRANSMITTING DOCUMENTS; SOFTWARE FOR APPARATUS AND DEVICES FOR SCANNING, RECORDING, PROCESSING, RECEIVING, REPRODUCING, TRANSMITTING, MODIFYING, COMPRESSING, DECOMPRESSING, MERGING OR ENHANCING OF DATA, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR MULTI FUNCTION MACHINES THAT COPY, PRINT, SCAN AND FAX AND COPIERS, PRINTERS, SCANNERS AND FACSIMILE MACHINES; DIGITAL CAMERAS AND DIGITAL CAMERA SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |