Drawing for KEGBOY

USPTO serial 76697854

KEGBOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KEGBOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nils H. Ljungman

NILS H. LJUNGMAN Nils H. Ljungman & AssociatesPO BOX 130GREENSBURG, PA 15601-0130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Containers made of metal for the transport and storage of beverages, beer, drinks and other liquids, liquid food, and liquid products of all kind, namely, barrels, kegs or tins of tinplate or aluminum with standardized connection valves produced by whole or partial deep-drawing techniquesACTIVE—
007Machines for breweries and the beverage industry, namely, machines for cleansing, filling and capping containers, barrels or kegs; machines for cleansing, filling and capping containers; machines for transporting and palletizing containers such as kegs and kegs with standardized connection valves, namely, palletizers, fork lifts, industrial robots, conveyors, conveyor belts, and belt conveyors; machines for filling of kegs having standardized connection valves with liquid; automatic industrial labeling machines for applying labels to containers and packaging machines for kegs having a standardized connection valveACTIVE—
020Containers made of plastics materials or synthetic composite materials for the transport and storage of beverages, beer, liquids, liquid food, liquid products of all kind, namely, kegs with a standardized connections valve manufactured by deep-drawing or stretch-molding/blowing techniquesACTIVE—
042Engineering services including engineering consulting services regarding planning, installation, operation, inspection, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and demolition of machines for the beverage industry and breweries, such as machines for cleaning, filling and capping, and machines for transport and palletizing kegs and kegs with standardized connection valves; engineering services regarding planning, installation, operation, inspection, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and demolition of machines for the production of kegs with standardized connection valves formed of metal or synthetic materials by deep-drawing or stretch-blowing/molding; design and development of computer programs for the data processing of information in direct connection with afore-mentioned services and engineering servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 1, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 26, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 25, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 11, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 11, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 4, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 18, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 15, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance