Drawing for DRX

USPTO serial 76697874

DRX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather A. Dunn

Heather A. Dunn DLA Piper LLP (US)555 Mission Street, Suite 2400San Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009integrated circuits and related firmware, namely, microprocessors, microcontrollers, and operating software for video and audio modulators for use with televisions, none being identification scanners or apparatus utilizing such scanners for reading labels and other identification marking on goods and packaging of goods to facilitate inventory control, tracking, sorting, and/or distribution of such goods none being identified as audio/video devices, namely, digital signal processors, compressors, limiters, expanders, switching, feedback suppression, equalization and filtering devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 26, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 7, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2011TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 7, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 7, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 13, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 7, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 4, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 28, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 22, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance