USPTO serial 76697960
SPARKLE STRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3932905Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 2011
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPARKLE STRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Valencia, CA
Valencia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARRY F. GITLIN
LARRY F. GITLIN RAPKIN, GITLIN & BEAUMONT21650 OXNARD ST STE 1620WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-7828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Flexible elongated strip of material having a reflecting or shiny surface for repelling rodents and other invasive garden animals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 3, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |