USPTO serial 76698036
MOTZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3891539Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2010
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOTZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip R. Warn
GREGORY L OZGA WARN PARTNERS, P.C.PO BOX 70098ROCHESTER HILLS, MI 48307-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for loss mitigation management in the field of default and distressed property management, loss mitigation tracking and documentation, default and financial information documentation, automated creation of documents related to loss mitigation, task tracking related to loss mitigation, and loss mitigation solution analyzer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 14, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |