USPTO serial 76698067
RIVIERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RIVIERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Miami Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bennett G. Feldman
BENNETT G. FELDMAN FELDMAN LAW OFFICE2655 LEJEUNE RD STE 514CORAL GABLES, FL 33134UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electric food blenders for domestic use; mechanical mixing machines, namely, kitchen mixers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | record players, audio tape players and recorders, stereo amplifiers and tuners, television sets, electric irons, namely, electric hand-held hair styling irons and electric hand-held irons; electronic calculators, radios incorporating clocks, loud speakers and cabinets for loudspeakers, compact disc players, video cassette players and recorders, digital video players, mini disc recorders and players | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | refrigerators, electric ranges, air conditioners, electric toasters and electric toaster ovens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |