USPTO serial 76698088
INSTANT BASEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSTANT BASEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI KOZLOWSKI & COMPANY5065 FOREST HILL DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, L5N 5A7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Basement renovations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |