Drawing for LOVED BY NATURE

USPTO serial 76698174

LOVED BY NATURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPP, HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOVED BY NATURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan S. Weinstein

JORDAN S. WEINSTEIN OBLON, SPIVAK, McCLELLAND, MAIER1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Soups; jams; jellies; potato-based and vegetable-based snack foods; frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetablesACTIVE—
030Breakfast cereal; cookies and crackers; pretzels; cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; pita chips; popcorn; granola based snack bars; grain-based food bars containing dried fruits, nuts, chocolate, peanut butter, and seeds; cereal based energy bars; salad dressings; salsa; pasta sauce; pizza; ice cream; sorbet; ice cream sandwiches; chocolate covered ice cream bon bons;frozen entrees consisting primarily of pasta or riceACTIVE—
032Fruit juices; vegetables juices; sparkling watersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 21, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 15, 2009PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Oct 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 6, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 6, 2009PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Sep 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance