Drawing for OVER THE TOP

USPTO serial 76698205

OVER THE TOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OVER THE TOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.

EDWARD D. LANQUIST, JR. Waddey & Patterson, P.C.1600 Division Street, Suite 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio and video tapes, cassettes and discs featuring inspirational, motivational and religious presentations for womenACTIVE
016Bibles; Posters, journals, brochures and books featuring inspirational and motivational stories and messages in the field of religionACTIVE
018Tote bags and carry-all and shopping bags made of canvasACTIVE
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, shorts, hats, jacketsACTIVE
045Arranging and conducting religious conferences for women featuring inspirational and motivational women speakersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Aug 29, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 16, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 3, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Aug 11, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 14, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 1, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 22, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 20, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 19, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 3, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 20, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 15, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Jan 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 31, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 30, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 30, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 30, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 12, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 25, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 25, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 14, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance