USPTO serial 76698543
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Goodwood, ON L0C 1A0, CA
Goodwood, ON L0C 1A0, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY PERVANAS
JEFFREY PERVANAS RICHES, McKENZIE & HERBERT LLPSuite 1800, 2 Bloor Street EastToronto, Ontario M4W 3J5,CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radio frequency identification system primarily consisting of transponder, transmit and receive antennas, and visual displays for locating and tracking personnel, locating and tracking equipment, locating and tracking machinery, and, locating and tracking vehicles and communicating the locating and tracking information to a databases; transponder; beacons, namely, transceivers for sending request signals and receiving data signals from transponder; transmit and receive antennas; computer software to receive data regarding the movement and location and personnel, equipment, machinery and vehicles and account for them; computer software to receive data regarding the movement and location and personnel, equipment, machinery and vehicles and display their location | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of radio frequency identification systems for locating and/or tracking personnel, equipment, machinery and vehicles; installation and maintenance of radio frequency identification systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |