USPTO serial 76698879
WORDS WORTH GIVING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WORDS WORTH GIVING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Southfield, MI
Southfield, MI
Southfield, MI
Southfield, MI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Inspirational and religious greeting cards, holiday cards, note cards, note pads, personal blank journals and calendars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Diggs, Marvin
- Other trademarks owned by Diggs, Marvin
- Other trademarks owned by Diggs, Marie
- Other trademarks owned by Diggs, Marie
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named WORDS WORTH GIVING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 25, 2011 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |