Drawing for ROLLOUT

USPTO serial 76698987

ROLLOUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROLLOUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra J. Franklin

13921 S BAHIA VISTA DRTRAVERSE CITY, MI 49684-7058UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online film and video production management services, namely, business and commercial management; team creation and management, namely, business management in the field of team development; production scheduling including interactive calendar, namely, appointment scheduling services; business management in the field of budget and finance reporting; and promotion tracking, namely, advertising and promotion servicesACTIVE—
038Project messaging, namely, electronic message transmissionACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for providing online project information, team creation and management, project messaging, production scheduling including interactive calendar, file uploading, budget/finance reporting and promotion tracking; file uploading, namely, application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for allowing data retrieval, upload, access and managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 5, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 4, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 19, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance