Drawing for SALON SELECTIVES

USPTO serial 76699115

SALON SELECTIVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SALON SELECTIVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH E. SUTTON

JOSEPH E SUTTON EZRA SUTTON PAPLAZA 9 BLDG 900 U S HWY 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020HAND-HELD MIRRORSINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
021HAIR BRUSHES; COMBSACTIVE—
026HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, STRETCH BANDS FOR HAIR, HAIR CLIPS, BARRETTES, HAIR BANDS, AND PONYTAIL HOLDERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 18, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 17, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 26, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 12, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 21, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance