USPTO serial 76699355
ENTERPRISE RESILIENCE MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENTERPRISE RESILIENCE MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark G. Knedeisen
MARK G. KNEDEISEN K&L Gates LLP535 Smithfield StreetHenry W. Oliver BuildingPittsburgh, PA 15222-2312Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services for businesses and institutions, relating to information systems integration, regulatory compliance, information security, and business and institutional procedure optimization; business services in the form of implementing a framework and methodology for businesses and institutions through a hybrid technology and consulting approach; business services in the form of rule set and best practices automation; enterprise architecture enabling public and private-sector organizations to respond to internal and external stressors | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2005 |
| 041 | On-line journals, namely, a blog featuring insights about an enterprise architecture for corporations, governmental agencies, transnational organizations, and nation-states in the age of globalization | ACTIVE | Mar 2, 2006 |
| 042 | Computer consulting services for businesses and institutions, relating to information systems integration, regulatory compliance, information security, and business and institutional procedure optimization; design and implementation of software; consulting and technology solutions, namely, in the form of a framework and methodologies relating to information systems integration, regulatory compliance, information security, and business and institutional procedure optimization; rule set automation and application of rules in the form of software code to technology systems: enterprise architecture enabling public and private-sector organizations to respond to internal and external stressors | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Enterra Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENTERPRISE RESILIENCE MANAGEMENT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |