USPTO serial 76700224
ITOUCH COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITOUCH COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chatsworth, CA
Chatsworth, CA
MRV COMMUNICATIONS - BOSTON DIVISION, INC.
CHELMSFORD, MA
Other trademarks owned by MRV COMMUNICATIONS - BOSTON DIVISION, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul G. Novak
Paul G. Novak Dickstein Shapiro LLP2049 Century Park East, Suite 700Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND HARDWARE, NAMELY, NETWORK INTERFACES, FIBER-OPTIC TRANSCEIVERS, FIBER-OPTIC SWITCHES, FIBER OPTIC REPEATERS, CONVERTERS AND OPTIMIZERS, WAVE DIVISION MULTIPLEXERS, FREE-SPACE OPTICS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, SWITCHES INCLUDING ETHERNET SWITCHES AND ROUTERS, FIBER-TO-THE-HOME AND ETHERNET-OVER-VDSL ACCESS AGGREGATORS, TERMINATORS AND REPEATERS, AND REMOTE PRESENCE MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SWITCHES, AND CONSOLE, ALARM, SENSOR AND POWER MANAGEMENT DEVICES; FREE-SPACE OPTICS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, ETHERNET SWITCHES AND ROUTERS, AND SOFTWARE SOLD BOTH AS COMPONENTS THEREOF AND SEPARATELY, NAMELY, SOFTWARE ADAPTED AND ARRANGED FOR OPERATING, INSTALLING, TESTING, DIAGNOSING AND MANAGING THE FOREGOING TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT; ALL FOR USE IN PROVIDING SERVICES AND MANAGEMENT WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING EQUIPMENT IN THE FIBER-OPTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY; AND FOR USE WITH REMOTE COMPUTERIZED TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER NETWORK MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MRV Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MRV Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MRV COMMUNICATIONS - BOSTON DIVISION, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ITOUCH COMMUNICATIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |