USPTO serial 76700492
LEEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas E. Thompkins, Jr.
Thomas E. Thompkins, Jr. IANDIORIO TESKA & COLEMAN255 Bear Hill RoadWALTHAM, MA 02451-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | vehicular electrical systems for drawing and controlling electric power from a vehicular power train and optionally an external power supply, and supplying such electric power via an on-board energy storage system to auxiliary power-consuming systems and export power applications, including refrigeration systems and aerial lift systems; and control systems including associated software, sensors and controllers for performing energy management between an energy storage system on-board a vehicle and one or more of: a vehicular engine, an external power supply and an on-board auxiliary power-consuming device | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |