USPTO serial 76701266
IANALYZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2010
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IANALYZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INTERNATIONAL ROAD DYNAMICS, INC.
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CA
INTERNATIONAL ROAD DYNAMICS, INC.
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
ROBERT W. ADAMS NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 N GLEBE RD 11TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22203-1808UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in vehicular traffic measurement monitoring and reporting same, namely, software used for the accessing or downloading of traffic data from remote or networked traffic monitoring sensors or data collection systems and the reporting of such data for use in discovering any relationship between the data and the characteristics of the traffic | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 24, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |