USPTO serial 76701743
BARI BEEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUNCH, TASHIA AUNGELIK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BARI BEEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed beef and pork products, namely, sliced beef, beef meatballs, and pork sausage | ACTIVE | Apr 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 17, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 17, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |