USPTO serial 76702084
HAND'S BEST FRIEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAND'S BEST FRIEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen E. Feldman
Stephen E. Feldman Feldman Law Group, P.C.220 East 42nd StreetSuite 3304New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical gloves | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2011 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 13, 2011 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |