USPTO serial 76702749
BIOTEXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOTEXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Murphy
DAVID B MURPHY O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP610 NEWPORT CENTER DR17TH FLOORNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-6419Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, surgical implants and biocompatible interfaces for artificial implants consisting of artificial materials bearing a an artificial surface adapted to disorganize scar tissue | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 7, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |