USPTO serial 76702773
JOEY'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOEY'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services featuring hamburgers, chicken sandwiches, salads and ice cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |