USPTO serial 76703442
BSAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BSAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Green Oakes, IL
Green Oakes, IL
Green Oakes, IL
Green Oakes, IL
Green Oakes, IL
Green Oakes, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward E. Roberts
PO BOX 3206DANA POINT, CA 92629-8206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Hygienic hand protectors for sanitary purposes in the nature of fitted antimicrobial covers and fitted antimicrobial sleeves that are covers, all for use on the handles of manually-operated carts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wilkerson, Ralph
- Other trademarks owned by Wilkerson, Ralph
- Other trademarks owned by Thompson, Patricia
- Other trademarks owned by Thompson, Patricia
- Other trademarks owned by Terrell, Georgette
- Other trademarks owned by Terrell, Georgette
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named BSAP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2012 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |