USPTO serial 76703583
CONDOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONDOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward J. DaRin
EDWARD J DARIN301 EAST COLORADO BOULEVARDSUITE 518PASADENA, CA 91101-1919Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Firearm accessories, namely, holsters, pistol holsters, holster belts, duty belts, shoulder holster harnesses, leg mounted harnesses, slings for firearms, straps for firearms, covers for firearms, cartridge pouches, packs and carriers, ammunition magazine pouches, holster and shoulder bags and drag bags for carrying ammunition and firearms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2011 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |