USPTO serial 76703666
INCA'S FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2012
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with INCA'S FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Passaic, NJ
Passaic, NJ
Passaic, NJ
PASSAIC, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence G. Fridman
Lawrence G. Fridman FEIGIN & FRIDMAN, LLC1037 ROUTE 46 E STE 107CLIFTON, NJ 07013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned or dried prepared food, namely, fruits, vegetables; canned or dried white corn, canned or dried hot peppers, namely, rocoto, panca, and amarillo; Dried prepared foods, namely, canary beans and potatoes; Canned or bottled food, namely, [ asparagus and ] olives in brine; [ fried chick peas; ] dried peaches; fried bananas; fried fava beans; [ and fried cassava; ] processed lemon grass | ACTIVE | Mar 4, 2010 |
| 030 | Hot pepper sauces, carob syrup; processed dried herbs, spices, flours, wheat hominy, and white corn hominy; dried prepared wheat; laurel leaves; processed herbs, namely, mint [, white rosemary ]; spices, namely, oregano, [ ground ginger, ] ground paprika, [ ground annatto, ] tumeric; teas, namely, linden and chamomile | ACTIVE | Mar 4, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PERUVIAN IMPORT COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PERUVIAN IMPORT COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PERUVIAN IMPORT COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PEIMCO BRANDS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named INCA'S FOOD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 24, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 24, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | CCCN | COUNTERCLAIM CANC. NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |