USPTO serial 76703695
RED RACER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED RACER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Central City Brewing Company Ltd
Surrey, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Huston
JULIA HUSTON Foley Hoag LLP155 SEAPORT BLVD STE 1600BOSTON, MA 02210-2600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer | ACTIVE | Dec 26, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |