USPTO serial 76703730
PROCLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROCLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay Lyn Schwartz
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4761UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical lenses; Optical lenses with anti-reflective coating | ACTIVE | Jul 16, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |