USPTO serial 76703816
BOSCIA B.B. CREAM BRIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOSCIA B.B. CREAM BRIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yasuo Muramatsu
YASUO MURAMATSU MURAMATSU & ASSOCIATES114 PACIFICA STE 310IRVINE, CA 92618-3329UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Creams, namely, cleansing creams, cold creams, foundation creams, hand creams, sunburn creams, eye creams, lip creams; Skin care and bath products, namely, sun block lotions and sprays, sunscreen lotions and sprays, self-tanning lotions and sprays, moisturizing lotions and sprays, after-sun lotions and sprays, body mask lotions and sprays, skin lotions and sprays, skin refiners, pore mattifiers, hair lotions and sprays, facial lotions and sprays, body lotions and sprays, moisturizers and toners, tinted moisturizers, after-bath lotions and sprays, cosmetic masks, body masks, skin masks, skin moisturizer masks, facial masks, beauty masks, facial beauty masks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2014 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2014 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |