USPTO serial 76704103
MARUKYO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2012
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARUKYO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MARUKYO SEIKA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Yonago-shi, Tottori, JP
MARUKYO SEIKA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Yonago-shi, Tottori, JP
MARUKYO SEIKA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Yonago-shi, Tottori, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean M. McGinn
SEAN M. MCGINN McGinn Intellectual Property Law Group8321 OLD COURTHOUSE RD STE 200VIENNA, VA 22182-3817UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Baked red bean cake (Dorayaki), Bun with bean-jam filling (Manju); Bean-jam filled wafers (Monaka) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARUKYO SEIKA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by MARUKYO SEIKA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by MARUKYO SEIKA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MARUKYO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2012 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |