USPTO serial 76704879
SEACRETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEACRETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NICOLE M. MEYER
NICOLE M. MEYER DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1875 EYE ST NW STE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20006-5420UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Franchising, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of hotels, motels, bars, restaurants and night clubs; franchising, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of catering services; franchising, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of entertainment facilities for band, comedy, sports, and show performances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |