Drawing for OPTIWAVE

USPTO serial 76705550

OPTIWAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OPTIWAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul G. Novak

Paul G. Novak Dickstein Shapiro LLP2049 Century Park East, Suite 700Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND HARDWARE FOR USE IN PACKET-ENABLED COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS, NAMELY, NETWORK INTERFACES, FIBER-OPTIC TRANSCEIVERS, FIBER OPTIC REPEATERS, CONVERTERS AND OPTIMIZERS, WAVE DIVISION MULTI-PLEXERS, FREE-SPACE OPTICS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, SWITCHES INCLUDING ETHERNET SWITCHES AND ROUTERS, FIBER-TO-THE-HOME AND ETHERNET-OVER-VDSL ACCESS AGGREGATORS, TERMINATORS AND REPEATERS, AND REMOTE PRESENCE MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SWITCHES, AND CONSOLE, ALARM, SENSOR AND POWER MANAGEMENT DEVICES; FREE-SPACE OPTICS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, ETHERNET SWITCHES AND ROUTERS, AND SOFTWARE SOLD BOTH AS COMPONENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS AND SEPARATELY, INCLUDING SOFTWARE ADAPTED AND ARRANGED FOR OPERATING, INSTALLING, TESTING, DIAGNOSING AND MANAGING THE FOREGOING TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE OPERATING SYSTEMS COMPRISING ONE OR MORE NETWORK DEVICES AND MICROPROCESSORS, ALL FOR USE IN PROVIDING SERVICES AND MANAGEMENT WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING EQUIPMENT IN THE FIBER-OPTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 4, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance