USPTO serial 76705569
AMERICAN CANDY HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2012
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMERICAN CANDY HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tsimshatsui East, HK
Tsimshatsui East, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Sun
RAYMOND SUN LAW OFFICES OF RAYMOND SUN20 CORPORATE PARKSTE 155IRVINE, CA 92606-5183Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys and novelty items, namely, plastic candy dispensers designed as toys | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2012 |
| 030 | Confectionery, namely, crystal sugar pieces and sweetmeats, namely, compressed sugar; dextrose and compressed dextrose for purposes of nourishment; gummy products, namely, fruit and fruit type gummy candies and fruit and yogurt gummy candies; refreshment pastilles and candy; bubble gum and chewing gum | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |