USPTO serial 76705639
THINGS ARE LOOKING UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THINGS ARE LOOKING UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M9A 1T8
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GIAN-CARL ZEOLI
GIAN-CARL ZEOLI NUTCASE MARKETING INC.5 SIR WILLIAMS LANEETOBICOKE, ON M9A1T8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, sweatshirts, t-shirts, sports jerseys, tank tops, pants, sweat pants, shorts, skirts, dresses, jogging suits, sleepwear, jackets, hats, toques, scarves, gloves, socks, swimwear, belts, wrist bands, and head bands; footwear namely, sandals, walking shoes, and running shoes; bags, namely, beach bags, sport bags, tote bags, messenger bags, duffel bags, pouches, purses, and hand bags; towels; umbrellas; blankets; sleeping bags; key chains; mugs; candles; journals; greeting cards; pens and pencils; stickers; pictures; posters; and mouse pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services; marketing services; fundraising services for non-profit and charitable organizations; and distribution of food, medical supplies, and general merchandise fornon-profit and charitable purposes | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 23, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |