Drawing for SHARP

USPTO serial 76705724

SHARP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHARP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Adams

ROBERT W. ADAMS Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.901 N GLEBE RD STE 1100ARLINGTON, VA 22203-4184UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Complete solar power systems comprised primarily of solar cells, photovoltaic solar modules, inverters and solar mounting devices and electric cables for use in connecting solar power systems in parallel with the utility grid, sold as a unitACTIVE—
035Operation of a business for others, namely, solar power businesses; retail electricity provider services, namely, providing a service that allows customers to purchase energy, namely, solar energyACTIVE—
036Financing solar power systems; financing services for equipment used in the production, generation, distribution, operation, maintenance, purchase and sale of solar energyACTIVE—
037Real estate development and building of solar power systems and plantsACTIVE—
039Distribution and transmission of electricity produced by solar energyACTIVE—
040Generating and producing solar power; generation of solar energy; and leasing equipment used in solar energy generationACTIVE—
042Designing of solar power systems and plantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 2, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 2, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2011CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Feb 22, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance