USPTO serial 76705805
OSMOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OSMOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul R. Martin
730 GLACIER WAYFAIRFIELD, CA 94534-4025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Subterranean irrigation system comprised of a water source, pvc pipe, burlap and a layer of wood chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2015 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |