USPTO serial 76708535
RICO FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RICO FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD ROMANOFF
355 FOOD CENTER DRBRONX, NY 10474-7000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | POULTRY | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |