USPTO serial 76708585
FIBERTECH, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIBERTECH, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID P. FRITCH
William J. Scott Fibertech, Inc.11744 BLUE BELL RDELBERFELD, IN 47613-9455UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | (Based on Use in Commerce) plastic bulk containers used in commercial use in material handling, processing plants, agriculture, automotive, manufacturing, pharmaceutical, packing plant industries; plastic locker used in commercial use in hospitals, material handling, processing plants, automotive; manufacturing; pharmaceutical; packing plants; schools; government, hospitality, offices, commercial laundry, hotels, uniform distributors, theme parks, aquatic facilities industries, and in consumer use by consumers; plastic pallets; plastic recycling carts used in commercial use in material recovery facilities, hospitals, processing plants, automotive, manufacturing,pharmaceutical, packing plants, schools, government, hospitality and office industries; plastic tubs; plastic laundry carts or trucks for commercial use in hospitals, commercial laundry, schools, government, hospitality, hotels, and uniform distributors industries; plastic laundry carts or trucks for commercial use in hospitals,commercial laundry, schools, government, hospitality, hotels, and uniform distributors industries; plastic utility carts for commercial use in material handling facilities, hospitals, material handling, processing plants, automotive, manufacturing, pharmaceutical, packing plant, schools, government, hospitality and offices industries;(Based on Intent to Use) plastic laundry carts or trucks for commercial use in hospitals, commercial laundry, schools, government, hospitality, hotels, and uniform distributors industries plastic laundry carts or trucks for commercial use in hospitals, commercial laundry, schools, government, hospitality, hotels, and uniform distributors industries; plastic utility carts for commercial use in material handling facilities, hospitals, material handling, processing plants, automotive,manufacturing, pharmaceutical, packing plant, schools, government,hospitality and offices industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2012 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |