Drawing for LARGE PRINT NEVER LOOKED SO GOOD

USPTO serial 76709250

LARGE PRINT NEVER LOOKED SO GOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LARGE PRINT NEVER LOOKED SO GOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard C. Woodbridge, Esq.

Richard C. Woodbridge, Esq. Fox Rothschild LLPP.O. Box 5231Princeton, NJ 08543-5231UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PAPER GOODS AND PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, DAILY PLANNERS, PERSONAL PLANNERS AND DESKTOP PLANNERS; TELEPHONE/ADDRESS BOOKS; CALENDARS; DESKTOP ORGANIZERS, PERSONAL ORGANIZERS AND STATIONERY USE ORGANIZERS; STATIONERY-TYPE PORTFOLIOS; PAD FOLIOS; BLANK JOURNALS AND BINDERS; APPOINTMENT BOOKS; WRITING PAPER PADS, STATIONERY NOTES CONTAINING ADHESIVE ON ONE SIDE FOR ATTACHMENT TO SURFACES; CHECK REGISTERS; SHOPPING LIST WRITING PADS; EXPENSE TRACKER WRITING PADS, NOTEBOOKS, PAPER EXPANDING FILES; BLANK JOURNALS AND LOG BOOKS FOR MEDICATION, FOOD AND FITNESS; DRY ERASE CALENDARS; DRY ERASE WRITING BOARDS; DRY ERASE WRITING SURFACES; WRITING INSTRUMENTS; PAPER COMPUTER KEYBOARD LABELS; AND COMPUTER KEYBOARD STICKERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2014MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 13, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2014RGEXREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Nov 10, 2014APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 14, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 16, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2014RFRRREQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 24, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 24, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 21, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 29, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 25, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 7, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 5, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 20, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance