USPTO serial 76709294
BITE-LITE NET WEIGHT 9.20 OUNCES NATURAL MOSQUITO REPELLENT USING CLOAK & SCATTER TECHNOLOGY LEMONGRASS & MINT SOY CANDLE WITH CITRONELLA OIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALVAREZ, COURTNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BITE-LITE NET WEIGHT 9.20 OUNCES NATURAL MOSQUITO REPELLENT USING CLOAK & SCATTER TECHNOLOGY LEMONGRASS & MINT SOY CANDLE WITH CITRONELLA OIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Rauchfuss, Jr.
GEORGE W. RAUCHFUSS, JR. Ohlandt, Greeley, Ruggiero & PerleOne Landmark SquareTenth FloorStamford, CT 06901-2682Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Insect repellent in candle form | ACTIVE | May 26, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bite-Lite LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named BITE-LITE NET WEIGHT 9.20 OUNCES NATURAL MOSQUITO REPELLENT USING CLOAK & SCATTER TECHNOLOGY LEMONGRASS & MINT SOY CANDLE WITH CITRONELLA OIL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |