USPTO serial 76709579
BRITEEYES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRITEEYES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Reed City, MI
Reed City, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel H. Bliss
Daniel H. Bliss HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC450 West Fourth StreetRoyal Oak, MI 48067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC ENTRY AND CONTROL MODULE FOR VEHICLES, INCLUDING CAPACITIVE TOUCH AND PROXIMITY SENSOR CIRCUITRY, NAMELY, A CAPACITIVE SENSE TOUCHPAD MOUNTED ON, WITHIN OR BEHIND AN EXTERIOR MIRROR OR WINDOW OR OTHER COMPONENT OF A VEHICLE, THE ELECTRONIC ENTRY AND CONTROL MODULE ALLOWING AN OWNER OF THE VEHICLE TO UNLOCK AND/OR LOCK THE VEHICLE AND/OR PERFORM VEHICLE FUNCTIONS, NAMELY, ACTUATION AND CONTROL OF VEHICLE LIGHTS, CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEM, AND/OR SOUND SYSTEM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |