USPTO serial 76709792
BOSCIA SUPER-COOL DE-PUFFING EYE BALM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOSCIA SUPER-COOL DE-PUFFING EYE BALM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yasuo Muramatsu
YASUO MURAMATSU MURAMATSU & ASSOCIATES26471 Rancho Parkway SouthSuite BLake Forest, CA 92630Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Creams, namely, cleansing creams, cold creams, foundation creams, hand creams, non-medicated sunburn creams for the prevention and treatment of sunburn, eye creams, lip creams; Skin care and bath products, namely, sun block lotions and sprays, sunscreen lotions and sprays, self-tanning lotions and sprays, moisturizing lotions and sprays, after-sun lotions and sprays, body mask lotions and sprays, skin lotions and sprays, non-medicated skin care preparations for minimizing the appearance of pores including making pores less visible and less shiny, hair lotions and sprays, facial lotions and sprays, body lotions and sprays, moisturizers and toners, tinted moisturizers, after-bath lotions and sprays, cosmetic masks, body masks, skin masks, skin moisturizer masks, facial masks, beauty masks, facial beauty masks, non-medicated facial strips for removing clogs from pores on the skin, non-medicated facial cleaning strips containing adhesives for peeling away the dirt and oil from the skin | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |