USPTO serial 76709828
B-LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B-LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TAICHUNG CITY 420, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mr. William E. Pelton
MR. WILLIAM E. PELTON COOPER & DUNHAM LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 20NEW YORK, NY 10112-0077UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | BICYCLE LAMPS; BURNERS FOR LAMPS; ELECTRIC LAMPS; ELECTRIC TORCHES FOR LIGHTING; LAMP CASINGS; LAMP REFLECTORS; LIGHT BULBS; LIGHTS FOR VEHICLES; LIGHTERS PRIMARILY FOR LIGHTING GRILLS, FIREPLACES AND CANDLES; LIGHTING APPARATUS, NAMELY, LIGHTING INSTALLATIONS; LIGHTING APPARATUS FOR VEHICLES; LIGHTING TUBES; LUMINOUS HOUSE NUMBERS; STREET LAMPS; ULTRAVIOLET RAY LAMPS, NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; VEHICLE REFLECTORS; VEHICLE TURN-SIGNAL LIGHT BULBS | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |