USPTO serial 76709861
SMART SYSTEMS FOR SMARTER PLANTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4362621Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 2013
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMART SYSTEMS FOR SMARTER PLANTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Province of Quebec, CA
Province of Quebec, CA
Province of Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Audra Kemp
Audra Kemp COLLEN IP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562-5615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for monitoring, optimizing and controlling the performance and the quality of production process for ready-mix concrete, concrete products, bulk cement, asphalt and raw materials used in the construction industry; Computer software for monitoring, optimizing and controlling the performance and the quality of production processes for fertilizer, animal feed and premix used in the agri-food industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2011 |
| 042 | Installation, repair and maintenance of computer software, and technical support in the nature of troubleshooting computer software problems, for software that optimizes and controls the performance and the quality of production processes for ready-mix concrete, concrete products, bulk cement, asphalt and raw materials used in the construction industry and optimizes and controls the quality of production processes for fertilizer, animal feed and premix used in the agri-food industry; business technology software consultation services for the construction industry and for the agri-food industry, namely, analysis and optimization of software performance; quality control for others; consulting services in the field of workplace automation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARCOTTE SYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MARCOTTE SYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MARCOTTE SYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SMART SYSTEMS FOR SMARTER PLANTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |