USPTO serial 76710574
GOTTA PEA?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWER, MARGARET
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOTTA PEA??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Punxsutawney, PA
Punxsutawney, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip M. Weiss
PHILIP M. WEISS Weiss & Weiss410 JERICHO TPKE STE 105JERICHO, NY 11753-1318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER AND VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT CONTENT, NAMELY, VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAMES, GAME FACTS, GAME HINTS, CHILDREN'S STORIES AND DIGITAL MUSIC FILES; COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; ELECTRONIC VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; ELECTRONIC GAME PROGRAMS; ELECTRONIC GAME SOFTWARE; INTERACTIVE VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; INTERACTIVE VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; INTERACTIVE VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; DIGITAL TRADING CARDS IN THE NATURE OF MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE RECORDED ON MAGNETIC MEDIA FEATURING COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS AND DATA; VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR VIDEO GAMES; VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE FOR MOBILE PHONE APPLICATIONS AND HANDHELD ELECTRONIC DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |