USPTO serial 76710576
GOLDEN PRAIRIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, ELIZABETH FLEMING
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOLDEN PRAIRIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James T. Nikolai
James T. Nikolai NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU, P.A.900 2ND AVE S STE 1550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3325UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cake mixes, donut mixes, bread mixes, roll mixes, bun mixes and cookie mixes sold in bulk to institutions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |