USPTO serial 76710607
HOUSTON COUGARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2016
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HOUSTON COUGARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
University of Houston System, THE
Houston, TX, US
University of Houston System, THE
Houston, TX, US
University of Houston System, THE
Houston, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer S. Sickler
Jennifer S. Sickler SICKLER LAW PLLC2726 Bissonnet St., No. 240-023Houston, TX 77005United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, hats, shirts, [ pants, sweat pants, ] sweat shirts, [ jackets, sweaters, rain coats, bandanas, aprons, ties, belts, ] socks, all of the foregoing relating to a university and/or to collegiate sports and other collegiate activities | ACTIVE | Apr 12, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by University of Houston System, THE
- Other trademarks owned by University of Houston System, THE
- Other trademarks owned by University of Houston System, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named HOUSTON COUGARS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |