USPTO serial 76711325
OUR PRODUCT LINE IS EXHAUSTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 12, 2013
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OUR PRODUCT LINE IS EXHAUSTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goldsboro, NC
Goldsboro, NC
Goldsboro, NC
AP EMISSIONS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
GOLDSBORO, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George Pappas
GEORGE PAPPAS PAPPAS LAW OFFICE919 S HARRISON STSTE 300FORT WAYNE, IN 46802-3698Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Exhaust components for engines, automobiles, trucks and other land vehicles, namely, mufflers, pipes, catalytic converters, glass pack mufflers, tips,hangers, brackets, gaskets, flanges, clamps and kits comprising two or more of the components sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AP Exhaust Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AP Exhaust Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AP Exhaust Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AP EMISSIONS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named OUR PRODUCT LINE IS EXHAUSTIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 20, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |