USPTO serial 76711434
SPIDERMAN' S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPIDERMAN' S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward P. Dutkiewicz
EDWARD P. DUTKIEWICZ Edward P. Dutkiewicz, P.A.PO BOX 937DADE CITY, FL 33526-0937UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Services for the residential and commercial building construction industry, namely, waterproofing of buildings, building restoration, window cleaning, building inspections, Building envelope construction consulting, namely, consulting in the field of construction of building exteriors | ABANDONED | Feb 20, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2013 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |